what’s in a name?
i was looking for a cool new name for a design business i had to create for my graphic design print media class. it was luftewaffe designs then i found out not only is it german for “airforce” but more importantly the “nazi airforce” so i quickly nixed that name. (i mean if you strip the word of its bad connontations its a pretty cool name just say it with me Luftwaffe Designs. see? it just flows…) anyway i was searching and searching for a new name when i just happen to hear that word on CNN. this word was sharp, it had oomph and it had this…this power. i had it!! TECHNOCRAT. it was every thing i dreamed of and more. Then i looked up the definition. this is what i got:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocrat_(derogatory)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocrat
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocrat_(comics)
www.udmercy.edu/faculty_pages/staudenmaier_sj/ethics/glossary.html
occawlonline.pearsoned.com/bookbind/pubbooks/stearns_awl/medialib/glossary/gloss_T.html
of course i prefer definition number 3 about to superhero but that is neither here nor there. it struck me how odd it was that some people think that engineers and scientisits should manage society. i think that they do for the most part. if not for scientists and engineers there would not be any developements made at all. we as a world would be stuck in the dark ages. america wouldn’t be america. and all that jazz. what do you think? Should scientists and engineers be in total control of society? how would that be good or bad?


Welcome to the use of the term!
Ryan Lanham said this on January 9, 2009 at 6:56 pm
Thanks! your my first comment!! :D
technokratic said this on January 22, 2009 at 5:35 pm